News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 Machiavellian substance and style in GSAHS decision making 

Machiavellian substance and style in GSAHS decision making

24/09/2008 3:35:00 PM
The health budget in NSW has suffered and is still suffering from a lower priority than could be the case.

This has caused systemic deficiencies to arise in the provision of care throughout the State.

Whether this results from Federal or State economies, or the combination of both, is not a primary concern in our community.

Being proud Australians, we are prepared to co-operate with others to overcome hard times.

The central concern held here at this time stems from the substance and style of decisions made in managing equitable provision of health care in this distant south-east corner of the State.

For several years a political preference to close Pambula hospital in favour of the larger hospital in Bega has been repeatedly tabled.

The local community has always resisted this with strong and rational argument that has won the day.

Now it seems that health system administrators are taking a different approach to achieve their bean-counting generated goal.

The administration of that budget in our area, over the past three years, appears to have been predicated on political expediency rather than on informed, responsible concern for the health-care needs of the population.

Decisions made by administrators within Greater Southern Area Health Services have the undeniable appearance of a deliberately orchestrated campaign designed to destroy what has been, for many years, a viable 28-bed country hospital.

Medical and surgical services, accident and emergence, maternity services and emergency surgical intervention that have all been available to a population stretching from Orbost and Mallacoota in the south to Bombala and Merimbula and its surrounds in the west and north are now under serious threat as the direct result of GSAHS's insidious campaign.

Prior to this current destructive maladministration the community felt pride in their hospital and gratitude for the quality services it provided.

Nine local GPs held visiting rights.

The annual multitude of holiday makers, daily Princes Highway travellers, occasional seafarers (including annual Sydney to Hobart race competitors) and regular plane commuters, showed confidence in visiting the Far South Coast knowing that the Pambula Hospital functioned at a high level.

Since 2005 adequate funds have not been allocated for general maintenance of the building and equipment so that nurses have found difficulty in properly fulfilling their responsibilities.

Recently, an unsolicited and unilateral GSAHS administrative decision was made to alternate some fully functional Pambula services between Pambula and Bega Hospitals on a weekly basis.

Rostering nurses between these workplaces and the imposition of awkwardly devised shift arrangements were both implemented without discussion, more it seems, to destabilise the working conditions of the Pambula hospital nursing staff than to expedite better health care in this area.

This period of poor maintenance, divisive shift management, and the consequent steady erosion of espirit-de-corp so disillusioned nursing staff that some left Pambula or quit the profession altogether and were not replaced.

This chain of events could clearly have been anticipated and avoided.

In fact it seems to have been expected and welcomed by GSAHS administrators.

Too few available nursing staff then predictably became the rationale used to justify subsequent GSAHS decisions to further downgrade the Pambula hospital's services.

In early September all maternity services were moved to Bega.

This decision was implemented while one of Pambula's Visiting Medical Officers and the most consistently vocal and vehement critic of GSAHS administration was on vacation.

It is now difficult to avoid the conclusion that GSAHS's apparent maladministration, which caused general nursing and theatre staff numbers to drop in the first place, has been a deliberate ploy designed force the closure of maternity and operating theatre services at Pambula as a first stage in certain demolition.

This Machiavellian strategy, evil in both substance and style, aligns with the past defeated proposals to close the Pambula hospital altogether.

Dr Rob Morton, chairman of the Pambula Medical Staff Council and Visiting Medical Officer at Pambula District Hospital last week tended his resignation from that latter post in frustration at this strangulation of services at Pambula District Hospital.

Quoted in the Merimbula News Weekly of September 17, Dr Morton is reported in saying, "We need to change the mindset of the middle management in charge of the hospital and I refer to the people who are looking after the services on the ground. They are not looking at Pambula hospital as a service that is respected and appreciated."

As has been the case in the past this local community wants Pambula hospital to remain open and re-establish the high level of health care it can and has achieved. It must be allowed to provide that vital community service and must not be vandalised in this way.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
28/11/2008 | The fiendish outrage in Mumbai this week will not dent India’s resilience one bit.
Yourguide to Your Toyota
 
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...